Roulette Systems: Dirty Done Cheap
| Air Date: |
 30 Dec 2024
| System Type: | ⬆️ Positive Progression |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buy-in: |
$200 |
Bet per Spin: |
$25
$45
$60
$75 |
| Total Bets: | $1,300 | Total Win/Loss: | -$175 |
| Total Expected Loss: | -$68.38 | Total Comp Value: | $13.67 |
| Total Spins: | 38 | Seconds between Spins: | 27 |
| Rating: |
C
- Plum
| JackAce Rating: |
D
- Eggplant
|
| Betting Simplicity: |
|
Progression Simplicity: |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip Uniformity: |
|
Jackpot Potential: |
|
| Scalability: |
|
Comp Value: |
|
Betting Schemes
Tier 1 ($25) | Tier 2 ($45) | Tier 3 ($60) | Tier 4 ($75)![Tier 1 ($25)](javascript:displayRbaImage('/assets/img/systems/2024-12-30/00-rba-0-800x768.png', '{"wheelType":1, "wagers":{"x12-col1":10, "x12-col2":15}}');){kind=link}
![Tier 2 ($45)](javascript:displayRbaImage('/assets/img/systems/2024-12-30/00-rba-1-800x768.png', '{"wheelType":1, "wagers":{"x12-col1":20, "x12-col2":25}}');){kind=link}
![Tier 3 ($60)](javascript:displayRbaImage('/assets/img/systems/2024-12-30/00-rba-2-800x768.png', '{"wheelType":1, "wagers":{"x12-col3":30, "x12-col2":30}}');){kind=link}
![Tier 4 ($75)](javascript:displayRbaImage('/assets/img/systems/2024-12-30/00-rba-3-800x768.png', '{"wheelType":1, "wagers":{"x12-col2":50, "x12-col3":25}}');){kind=link}
View this bet in the Roulette Bet Analyzer
Friend #1 Results
| Spin # | Number | Result | Amount Bet | Running Total | Time | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+$5 | $25 | +$5 | 0:44 | |
| 2 |
|
+$20 | $25 | +$25 | 1:13 |
Result displayed in video was
+$5
|
| 3 |
|
-$45 WHACK |
$45 | -$20 | 1:47 | |
| 4 |
|
+$5 | $25 | -$15 | 2:12 | |
| 5 |
|
+$5 | $25 | -$10 | 2:44 | |
| 6 |
|
+$5 | $25 | -$5 | 3:01 | |
| 7 |
|
+$5 | $25 | $0 | 3:24 | |
| 8 |
|
-$25 WHACK |
$25 | -$25 | 3:47 |
Result displayed in video was
-$45
|
| 9 |
|
+$5 | $25 | -$20 | 4:19 | Alex moved his column bets around. |
| 10 |
|
-$45 WHACK |
$45 | -$65 | 4:38 | |
| 11 |
|
+$5 | $25 | -$60 | 4:57 | |
| 12 |
|
-$25 WHACK |
$25 | -$85 | 5:09 | Spin was not displayed but the dealer indicated what number it was. |
| 13 |
|
-$25 WHACK |
$25 | -$110 | 5:28 | |
| 14 |
|
+$20 | $25 | -$90 | 5:53 | |
| 15 |
|
+$15 | $45 | -$75 | 6:09 | |
| 16 |
|
+$30 | $60 | -$45 | 6:31 | |
| 17 |
|
-$25 WHACK |
$25 | -$70 | 7:11 | |
| 18 |
|
-$25 WHACK |
$25 | -$95 | 7:43 | |
| 19 |
|
-$25 WHACK |
$25 | -$120 | 8:08 | |
| 20 |
|
+$5 | $25 | -$115 | 8:39 | |
| 21 |
|
+$20 | $25 | -$95 | 9:05 | |
| 22 |
|
-$45 WHACK |
$45 | -$140 | 9:22 | |
| 23 |
|
-$25 WHACK |
$25 | -$165 | 9:54 | |
| 24 |
|
+$5 | $25 | -$160 | 10:13 | |
| 25 |
|
-$25 WHACK |
$25 | -$185 | 10:42 | |
| 26 |
|
-$30 WHACK |
$30 | -$215 | 11:05 |
Result displayed in video was
-$25
Alex just bet $15 x 2 because he didn't have enough money to make the correct bet. |
|
Expected Loss |
Total Bets |
Total Win/Loss |
||||
| -$40.50 | $770 | -$215 |
Friend #2 Results
| Spin # | Number | Result | Amount Bet | Running Total | Time | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 |
|
+$20 | $25 | +$20 | 12:01 | |
| 28 |
|
+$15 | $45 | +$35 | 13:26 | |
| 29 |
|
+$30 | $60 | +$65 | 14:16 | |
| 30 |
|
-$25 WHACK |
$25 | +$40 | 14:57 | |
| 31 |
|
-$25 WHACK |
$25 | +$15 | 15:18 | |
| 32 |
|
+$20 | $25 | +$35 | 15:42 | |
| 33 |
|
+$15 | $45 | +$50 | 16:09 | |
| 34 |
|
-$75 WHACK |
$75 | -$25 | 16:44 | |
| 35 |
|
+$20 | $25 | -$5 | 17:05 | |
| 36 |
|
+$30 | $45 | +$25 | 17:31 | |
| 37 |
|
+$75 | $75 | +$100 | 17:52 | |
| 38 |
|
-$60 WHACK |
$60 | +$40 | 18:25 | |
|
Expected Loss |
Total Bets |
Total Win/Loss |
||||
| -$27.87 | $530 | +$40 |
This is a ⬆️ Positive Progression system that starts out with the uneven double column bet kinda like Nolley Molley .
Tier 1: If you only win +$5 or lose -$25, then stay on tier 1.
If you win +$20, then go to the next tier ($25 + $20).
Tier 2: If you win +$15, then go to tier 3. If you win +$30, then to to tier 4. If you lose, restart at tier 1.
Tier 3: If you win, go to tier 4. If you lose, then restart.
Tier 4: Keep betting here until you lose. Then reset to tier 1.
The editing was really bad for CEG's video. Lots of mistakes and some results not shown on screen. It was difficult to tell where the discrepancies are. And for some reason, the sound effects were SUPER LOUD for this video.